Who ran the worst Senate campaign in 2016? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 11:23:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Who ran the worst Senate campaign in 2016? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: well?
#1
Ted Strickland
 
#2
Roy Blunt
 
#3
Mark Kirk
 
#4
Loretta Sanchez
 
#5
Darryl Glenn
 
#6
Jim Barksdale
 
#7
Evan Bayh
 
#8
Rand Paul
 
#9
Joe Heck
 
#10
Kelly Ayotte
 
#11
Russ Feingold
 
#12
Someone Else (Please inform me)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 102

Author Topic: Who ran the worst Senate campaign in 2016?  (Read 5075 times)
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« on: November 20, 2016, 04:04:41 AM »

Strickland, Bayh and Feingold. The new Charlie Christs.
Um no Charlie Christ is a newly elected Congressmen!
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 24, 2016, 11:21:21 PM »

Probably Strickland. He was a two-stint congressman and a Governor and he lost by 21% points. He let Portman attack him and didn't counter Portman's attack ads at all. Portman did probably did run the best campaign out of any US Senate Candidate though this cycle. He was "on the ground" a lot courting voters I think.

Bayh lost because he was a lobbyist and people don't want to vote in former lobbyists this cycle. They were angry at Washington DC just like they were in 2010 and wanted to send "the political class" a message. 
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 26, 2016, 06:42:43 PM »

Probably Strickland. He was a two-stint congressman and a Governor and he lost by 21% points. He let Portman attack him and didn't counter Portman's attack ads at all. Portman did probably did run the best campaign out of any US Senate Candidate though this cycle. He was "on the ground" a lot courting voters I think.

Bayh lost because he was a lobbyist and people don't want to vote in former lobbyists this cycle. They were angry at Washington DC just like they were in 2010 and wanted to send "the political class" a message. 
Bayh was also an establishment candidate, and he seemed to be out of touch with IN; people perhaps didn't see him as one of their own anymore.

That IS what did Lugar in.
Well Coats won in 2010 and he was a lobbyist after he retired from the US Senate in 1998.

Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #3 on: November 26, 2016, 06:52:40 PM »

What was so bad about Rand Paul's campaign? That he ran 5 points behind Trump?

I cast a wide net - Rand ran pretty far behind The Donald this year and pretty close to his 2010 result, despite being in the Senate for a full term and getting an opponent who nobody really gave a shot.

It's pretty normal for a local Kentucky Republican to run behind a national Republican, no?
Basically a KY Dem US Senate Candidate is like an NJ Republican US Senate Candidate in that both generic US Senate Candidates from both states can get 45% of the vote. They just can't get over 45% of the vote!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.