Minnesota- Why can't the GOP get the job done there? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 08:52:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Minnesota- Why can't the GOP get the job done there? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Minnesota- Why can't the GOP get the job done there?  (Read 10323 times)
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« on: August 15, 2013, 12:32:12 PM »

Coleman and Pawlenty were exceptions. GOP who wanted no parts of ANWR. It was close because of rural/urban divide like OR and Iowa. DFL are now the office holders in Democratic Minneaota.

They're both very moderate Republicans too.

Pawlenty is a Reagan Conservative. Coleman he was a Centrist Republican in the US Senate.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2013, 12:53:21 AM »

Well "The Twin Cities" aren't friendly voting wise to Republican Presidential Candidates.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 20, 2013, 08:13:10 PM »

Well "The Twin Cities" aren't friendly voting wise to Republican Presidential Candidates.

Two party vote 2012

Minneapolis- Obama 83% - Romney 17%
St Paul- Obama 78% - Romney 22%

That has to rank right up there with the most Democratic white majority cities in the nation.

This is another good point. The farmer's labor ideals have been big in Minnesota ever since the early 20th century. Minnesota isn't the only state we're having trouble in though. I'd say the same about Michigan, Oregon, Pennsylvania, maybe Maine, and Wisconsin and New Hampshire are looking more that way.
MI-The GOP used to win there before 1992 in Presidential Elections. Bush W. almost won PA in 2000 and 2004. NH is a swing state now and probably will always be that way. Maine- a GOP Presidential Candidate hasn't carried the state since 1988 although Bush W. did do good there I think both times. Wisconsin was close 2000 and 2004(especially-500 votes) but an R Presidential Candidate hasn't carried the state since 1984.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #3 on: September 20, 2013, 08:19:08 PM »

Why is Northeast-North Central MN so Democratic? I guess that area is similar to some Democratic Farm Area's in Iowa term of voting.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


« Reply #4 on: November 29, 2013, 05:56:17 PM »

@ Al

The key issue you're missing is race. In Madison, Duluth and St. Paul, there is no racialized other to hate. In Toledo, Youngstown, Flint and Pontiac, there is a significant Black community that has prevented the erosion of the white Democratic vote.

If you want to see a full white working class collapse map, look at 2010. Hideous, ghastly results in every city and state. Democrats actually lost very few votes among the "creative class", they were just massacred amongst downscale whites.

Is that because they specifically disliked Democrats or because they were angry at the status quo/powers that be/incumbents, who happened to be Democrats? How well did Republicans do among the white working class in 2006, when they were the incumbent party with targets all over their backs?
The Republicans won whites by 4%- 52-48 or 51-47% in 2006.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 10 queries.