Toobin says Supreme Court retirement "imminent" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 01:36:22 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Toobin says Supreme Court retirement "imminent" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Toobin says Supreme Court retirement "imminent"  (Read 2399 times)
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« on: January 18, 2022, 12:52:35 PM »

Excited to learn more about this "Kantaji Brown Jackson"
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2022, 08:44:22 PM »

Maybe its Sotomayor.  She has become increasingly mentally unhinged thanks to Covid and now refuses to be in the same room as unmasked people, despite presumably being fully vaccinated.  Since she's too afraid to attend in person work-related meetings, seems possible she's going to retire soon realizing that Covid is never going away.

She literally has a chronic auto-immune disorder and at much higher risk for a serious covid infenction ffs

Gorsuch is literally putting her life in danger
He "literally" is not. Gorsuch (like every other justice) is fully vaccinated and boosted, and is currently asymptomatic. If Sotomayor is still worried about transmission, she always has the option of wearing an N95 mask — which, as we've discussed extensively over the last few weeks, protects the wearer even if other people are not wearing masks. The likelihood of transmission from a boosted, asymptomatic person to a boosted, N95-wearing person is basically nil. This is theater, nothing more.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2022, 12:31:22 PM »
« Edited: January 19, 2022, 12:40:50 PM by Donerail »

Gorsuch is literally putting her life in danger
He "literally" is not. Gorsuch (like every other justice) is fully vaccinated and boosted, and is currently asymptomatic. If Sotomayor is still worried about transmission, she always has the option of wearing an N95 mask — which, as we've discussed extensively over the last few weeks, protects the wearer even if other people are not wearing masks. The likelihood of transmission from a boosted, asymptomatic person to a boosted, N95-wearing person is basically nil. This is theater, nothing more.
If politely asking your coworkers to wear a mask while you’re all in a meeting together is “theater,” then what do you call being the one jerk in the office who refuses to wear one?
I understand that people should be accommodating of their coworkers, but at some point you have to draw a line. Gorsuch is not just fully vaccinated and boosted — he, like every other justice (and everyone else in the room), is also tested every morning before argument. It strikes me as more than a little unreasonable, even with a medical condition, to demand a triple-vaxxed person who tested negative an hour ago to still wear a mask.

At any rate, it seems more than a little odd to single out Gorsuch here — Thomas and Alito both removed their masks as soon as they were seated, and Kavanaugh, Roberts and Barrett (as well as the attorneys) removed their masks whenever they were speaking. (Which, for a disease spread mostly by the kind of droplets you expel when speaking, is...) Making a point about Gorsuch not wearing it when they're walking up to the bench, but not making the same point about the other justices removing their masks when they're actually seated together and asking questions during argument, is theater — it's wholly disconnected from the actual risks of spread.

Anyway, turns out this story is bs
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 10 queries.