Strongly doubt that the DSA will formally endorse either Hawkins or La Riva. The DSA takes endorsements seriously and wants them to mean something — no point in endorsing (which the DSA uses to mean putting financial and organizing resources behind a candidate, not just providing a stamp of approval) a third-party presidential candidate who's going to be mostly irrelevant.
Read: they’re opportunists who want to keep getting on the gravy train of elected office.
Yes, the DSA is focused on winning local and state races while building a rank-and-file union movement. Not sure that either of those qualify as a "gravy train" (even in Chicago, being an alderman isn't what it once was). Also not sure how that makes them "opportunists."
You know what makes a candidate really irrelevant? It’s not having backup
I can think of lots of other things that make candidates irrelevant! You're using the phrase "popular front" like this is Europe in the 30s, but the conditions in America now are entirely different — there is no major left-wing campaign in this election and no hope of building one. Whether a "popular front" includes five or seven fairly minor groups will not impact that outcome.
and the fact that the Democratic Socialists of America won’t aide the only major independent democratic socialist running for president as part of a popular front puts them right where the now social democratic CPUSA are, either cowards, opportunists, plants, or odd sectarians who lack solidarity.
Who would that be? I certainly haven't heard of any major candidates running for president to the left of one Joe Biden.
What’s worse is that given GPUS + SPUSA have around 250k and 1.5k members respectively along with 131 elected officials, how exactly then is the HH/ANW campaign irrelevant?
Congratulations, you have a handful of school board members and a strong chance of getting as many votes as that McMuffin guy in 2016.
The goal is to pick fights you have a chance of winning. Sometimes that works, sometimes it doesn't, but the DSA's accomplished more in the last few years than decades of quixotic presidential campaigns. Don't blame people because they won't fight your losing battles.