Democratic Ides of March Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 06:07:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Ides of March Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democratic Ides of March Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET)  (Read 45371 times)
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,755
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

« on: March 15, 2016, 02:08:50 PM »

I'm scared.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,755
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2016, 05:26:47 PM »

Hillary wins all but MO.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,755
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

« Reply #2 on: March 15, 2016, 05:33:50 PM »


yaaasss
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,755
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

« Reply #3 on: March 15, 2016, 11:43:48 PM »

I KNEW IT YES YES YES I HAVE EARNED THE RIGHT TO BE EVEN MORE INSUFFERABLE THAN USUAL SHE F-CKING DID IT!!
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,755
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

« Reply #4 on: March 15, 2016, 11:55:25 PM »


Oy that Michigan outcome is going to be annoying to remember. At least it was an outlier.

I wonder if the Michigan result scared complacent Hillary voters into turning out in today's five states. In other words, it might have been the kick in the ass that allowed Hillary to sweep the night. And if that's the case, it's totally worth it.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,755
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

« Reply #5 on: March 15, 2016, 11:57:30 PM »


Well, at least the regional candidate talk can finally be put to rest.

You realize the "she's a woman" vote put her on top in at least five of those six top states

lel

What an extremely dismissive way to treat voters who are concerned about the very real structural disadvantages women face in the public sphere. Maybe being a woman actually is a merit, hmm?

Roll Eyes
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,755
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2016, 12:21:09 AM »


Well, at least the regional candidate talk can finally be put to rest.

You realize the "she's a woman" vote put her on top in at least five of those six top states

lel

What an extremely dismissive way to treat voters who are concerned about the very real structural disadvantages women face in the public sphere. Maybe being a woman actually is a merit, hmm?

Roll Eyes

Is that why you're always getting wild about any female candidate, regardless of party and ideology?

I think it's important to have more women in politics, but I disagree with your premise. Liking Susana Martinez and Hillary Clinton hardly qualifies as "getting wild about any female candidate."
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.