"Corporate whore" is not sexist. Most Republicans (like Mitt Romney) are also corporate whores.
Again. When you call woman a "whore", it has this nasty ring about this.
a "corporate whore" doesn't have a gender, or rather, the gender of the person being called it is irrelevant. If I call a group of people a bunch of "corporate whores" and several of them are women is it wrong?
Well, "wrong" is subjective, but I've reached a point in my life where I'd judge pretty much anyone who uses that word negatively. There's no need for it and everyone knows where it comes from and what it connotes. And throwing it around to describe Hillary Clinton and then trying to argue that it's not an attack on her gender—this being someone who is blazing trails for women and who's been subjected to it all—rings pretty hollow. No one ever called Mitt Romney a "corporate whore" even though I suspect he'd fit the definition more than almost anyone... and I think it's pretty obvious why no one thought to give him that moniker.