What would be the best part about Romney creating 500,000 new jobs a month? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 12:16:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  What would be the best part about Romney creating 500,000 new jobs a month? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Well?
#1
He'd beat the 8 years of George W Bush in 3 months		  
#2
He'd beat the 12 years of George Bushes in 8 months		  
#3
He'd have the best months for jobs since Carter		  
#4
These would be magical jobs		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 41

Author Topic: What would be the best part about Romney creating 500,000 new jobs a month?  (Read 2273 times)
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,765
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35
« on: May 06, 2012, 11:20:53 PM »
Quote from: Mitt Romney, Economic Heavyweight on May 06, 2012, 08:31:24 PM
The best part, he would be reelected in 2016 in a landslide.

Took the words right out of my mouth.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,765
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35
« Reply #1 on: May 07, 2012, 01:08:33 PM »
Quote from: King on May 07, 2012, 01:02:20 PM
Combine his 500,000 jobs a month plan with advisor Tim Pawlenty's 5% GDP annual growth plan and, by the end of his second term, poverty will be defined as only being able to wipe your bum with $1 bills.

Interestingly, that situation will also occur if Obama wins re-election. Dollar bills will be so worthless that they'll be the more economical alternative to toilet paper.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,765
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35
« Reply #2 on: May 07, 2012, 01:26:33 PM »
haha, mine definitely took the snooty approach Tongue
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,765
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35
« Reply #3 on: May 09, 2012, 12:52:26 AM »
I'll use the example of the EPA to show that you're oversimplifying this.

1) This useless government agency employees people. This useless government agency exists because of government. Thus, government created jobs.

2) On the flipside, this useless government agency imposes restrictions on business, making it more difficult for the private sector to create jobs. Thus, if this useless government agency didn't exist, the private sector could create more jobs than it is currently able to create.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.