Michaelf7777777
Rookie
Posts: 76
|
|
« on: February 25, 2012, 05:43:32 PM » |
|
Yes they should as voters should have the option to remove them (and it is even easier in the US as they can be beaten in either the primaries or the General Election than it is in many parliamentary countries with no term limits such as the UK, Australia and New Zealand). It is also unlikely that any 'Presidents for Life' would happen in this situation because voter fatigue at the incumbents will enable them to be beaten (Since WWII the longest one PM has lasted in power continously in the UK is 11 years and in New Zealand 12 years)
|