What If: Nixon/Rockefeller vs. Kennedy/Johnson 1960 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 02:46:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  What If: Nixon/Rockefeller vs. Kennedy/Johnson 1960 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: If Nelson Rockefeller had been Nixon's running mate instead of Henry Cabot Lodge in 1960, who would you have voted for?
#1
Nixon/Rockefeller (R)
 
#2
Kennedy/Johnson (D)
 
#3
Someone Else
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 17

Author Topic: What If: Nixon/Rockefeller vs. Kennedy/Johnson 1960  (Read 6269 times)
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

« on: June 08, 2012, 11:02:09 PM »

Kennedy.  Still two RINOs, and Kennedy was more conservative than Dick.  But I would've supported Goldwater and Knowland in the primaries.  And would've preferred brown for vp on the dem side
Logged
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2012, 12:28:52 AM »

Not sure. I like both Nixon and Kennedy, and Rockefeller makes me a little less inclined to support Nixon, but hey, he can't be worse than LBJ.

Nixon victory probably. Not sure how Illinois would fall.

So Rockefeller isn't worse than LBJ?!  At least we had hopes of winning seats in congress in 66 with a democrat in control
Logged
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2012, 12:32:54 AM »

Kennedy.  Still two RINOs, and Kennedy was more conservative than Dick.  But I would've supported Goldwater and Knowland in the primaries.  And would've preferred brown for vp on the dem side

I, as a conservative and as a Republican, strongly dislike the term "RINO".  There is plenty of room for varying opinions in both parties.  And even then, they made up the majority of the Republican Party back then.  Nixon was by far the lesser of two evils at that time.  Nixon/Rockefeller would have been a virtually unbeatable ticket, and it is, in my opinion, better to have the victory of some of our policies than the defeat of all of them.  Although I'm conservative, I tend to prefer the demeanor of East Coast Republicans like Rockefeller.

Interestingly enough, with Henry Cabot Lodge as the VP candidate for the Republicans, it was still one of the closest presidential elections in our nation's history...

But my problem is that JFK was more conservative than Nixon, and more of a hawk on foreign policy (I wouldve been a hawk during the Cold War, and I wish that Castro's botched assassination had been better planned, etc.)

JFK gave us tax cuts, strengthened the Gold Standard, and put us into space.  Nixon would've been less able to boost American morale IMO.  Plus, after sixteen years of GOP control (Nixon would've likely been a two-termer), I think conservatives would be in for a rough ride in 74, 76, and 80
Logged
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2012, 05:23:31 PM »
« Edited: June 28, 2012, 01:42:49 PM by Jerseyrules »

This TL is on ah.com by the way.

EDIT: That's it; all along the watchtower.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.