Was a better historian than an economist.
Quite so. Though, in fairness, it isn't as though other economists of the time covered themselves in intellectual glory...
Yes but since when have economists ever covered themselves in intellectual glory?
Eh, I think even you might have good things to say about John Kenneth Galbraith. Unless you're even more jaded than you let on, of course.
Well, if you think I'm jaded given my posts, I think you should be glad that I never post drunk.
The language is perhaps somewhat imprecise, but surely you get the gist of what I'm trying to say, no?
I will say that it would be lovely to have a window on your
actual hopes and dreams (I'd say views but I know where that would probably lead me) once in a while, if they even exist anymore beyond the meta-world of poking at people's delusions. Starting with, because why not, what
do you think of Galbraith anyway?