July 2017 Southern Elections Tracker (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 01:12:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  July 2017 Southern Elections Tracker (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: July 2017 Southern Elections Tracker  (Read 2285 times)
Vern
vern1988
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,278
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.30, S: -0.70

P P P

« on: July 13, 2017, 06:02:25 PM »

Let the fun begin!
Logged
Vern
vern1988
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,278
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.30, S: -0.70

P P P

« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2017, 10:37:44 AM »

Thank you for your hard work!
Logged
Vern
vern1988
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,278
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.30, S: -0.70

P P P

« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2017, 11:56:54 AM »

Does Dukes vote add to the total number of voters?
Logged
Vern
vern1988
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,278
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.30, S: -0.70

P P P

« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2017, 12:23:25 PM »

Ok thank you!
Logged
Vern
vern1988
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,278
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.30, S: -0.70

P P P

« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2017, 10:48:35 PM »

Update: Peebs has just informed me that she will be using the Paul Lockett STV calculator to determine the chamber winners.  Therefore, you can disregard the 'elected' and 'elim' columns in my spreadsheet.

Since counting methods always seem to cause controversy for these sorts of elections, there are two important points to make about Paul Lockett's calculator.

1) The quota can be a fraction, as it is rounded up to two decimal places. The formula used by PL is totalvotes/(seats+1), while the typical formula is 1+floor(totalvotes/(seats+1)). This means that the current quota is 3.00, rather than 4.

2) Only one candidate is elected at a time, starting at the person with the highest votes. This is in contrast to the standard practice of electing everyone who meets or exceeds the quota on the first round, and reallocating afterwards.

I must say this change in method makes absolutely no sense and will only serve to confuse people since that is not the way that the House is calculated.

what would the seats look like if they were calculated like the House?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.