But for cutting-edge technology, specialists, and immediate service ours is superior.
...if you have the money (and certain other things). And if you don't? Ordinary people can have rare-and-serious illlnesses as well...
I didn't say it was cheap or that it was universal. My point was that, in the US's system, we should strive to keep the good aspects of our care while simultaneously providing universal coverage (however one may go about it).
There's absolutely no reason why high-quality specialist care can't run alongside a state healthcare system. And, speaking from very recent personal experience, no reason why it can't be part of it.
Vanity operations and the like; that's different.