Poverty - relative vs. absolute (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 07:05:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Poverty - relative vs. absolute (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which kind of poverty do you think is more important to address? (descriptions below)
#1
relative poverty
 
#2
absolute poverty
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 20

Author Topic: Poverty - relative vs. absolute  (Read 3023 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,900
United Kingdom


« on: January 21, 2006, 07:28:56 AM »

I disagree with the concepts of absolute and relative poverty; actual absolute poverty would have to involve having absolutely nothing or the term has no real meaning at all, and taken to it's logical conclusion, relative poverty means that a man making $1million in some gated neighbourhood where the average income is $5million is somehow "poor". Up to a point both concepts are actually very demeaning to the people apparently included in each catagory. Telling someone that has something that they have nothing is just rude as is telling some poor bastard in St Denis, Bootle or the Bronx that thier poverty is merely "relative". Not that it matters because "poors" aren't real people. They probably smell as well, right?

</rant>
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 13 queries.