The Future of Social Conservatism (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 04:23:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  The Future of Social Conservatism (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Future of Social Conservatism  (Read 6619 times)
NY Jew
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 538


« on: September 16, 2011, 03:00:50 PM »

But seriously folks............

I was half way done with a very sarcastic post when I decided to just come out straight (no pun intended!) with my thoughts on this matter:

Like Lief said before me Social Conservatism doesn't ever really ever die it just evolves into different issues.  Issues that didn't matter before.  I mean yeah sure to a lot of people here you might immediately start joking "ha yeah the f***ing of baby horses isn't an issue that I thought about much before!".  But hear me out for a second:

In the early days of the republic, let us say sometime during the Articles of Confederation (in the 1780's) when our forefathers drank untold amounts of liquor that would probably be enough to kill off an entire college fraternity, how many people thought Prohibition would be an important issue for debate.....much less be made into a Constitutional Amendment?

How much concern did northern WASPs have about Catholic immigrants in the 1820's?  Would somebody, in 1828, who suggested barring non-protestants from running for office be given the same amount of attention as those who would in 1854.........or would they get criticized for ignoring those damned Masons?

In mostly rural and underpopulated 1804 America, which just made the Louisiana Purchase, was the argument for immigration restrictions as strong as it was in modernized urban 1924 America?

In 1938, how many people thought about declaring war on drugs?

In 1960 how many people, even the devoutly religious or black fearing southerners, worried about a "homosexual agenda"?

In 2011, how many people were worried about "clone rights"?  How about massive illegal immigration from Quebec?  Or how about the evils of Rastafarianism?  Or how about internet censorship as part of the "War on Anonymous"?

in the 60's no one ever thought that homosexual agenda would lead to what it has become if they would have realized that they would have destroyed it before it started.  as opposed to all your other ones
Logged
NY Jew
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 538


« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2011, 03:03:49 PM »
« Edited: September 16, 2011, 03:07:33 PM by NY Jew »

Socially conservative societies will tend towards demographic growth, while socially liberal societies will tend towards demographic decline. As a result, over time, the pool of immigrants will be more socially conservative every generation. We are witnessing, more or less, demographic transformation occuring in Israel and Turkey right now as the more socially conservative religious elements reproduce faster than secular folk.

well that's the dirty little secret how NY9 happened Orthodox Jews have been the fastest growing natural demographic.  We have children and
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.