Views on nuclear disarmament? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 11:04:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Views on nuclear disarmament? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Support immediate nuclear disarmament
 
#2
Support gradual nuclear disarmament
 
#3
Oppose nuclear disarmerment
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 38

Author Topic: Views on nuclear disarmament?  (Read 579 times)
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,255
Uruguay


« on: August 12, 2017, 10:13:20 AM »

Clearly THE most important issue in the last 72 years and 6 days.

I voted for option 1, but option 2 is all right as well. Clearly there are too many in the
world and if the US wants to stop other nations from having and possibly using them
it would be prudent to start reducing our own and at an accelerated pace and start immediately.

The situation in NK is quite disturbing and that is an understatement. Nukes should be taken
off the table as an option. I agree 100% with those who say diplomacy is the only answer.

It may sound ludicrous to suggest that we should "just let NK have them and leave it alone."
However, I think that the fears of them having them, when so many other crazies have had them, may possibly be a little bit of hyperbole. At any rate, the whole MAD theory is just that, MAD.
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,255
Uruguay


« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2017, 10:14:16 AM »

They will exist until something even more terrifying replaces them.
Perhaps biological weapons are more terrifying.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 12 queries.