Should the Weimar Republic have banned Adolf Hitler from becoming Chancellor in 1933? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 05:40:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Should the Weimar Republic have banned Adolf Hitler from becoming Chancellor in 1933? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should the Weimar Republic have legally banned Adolf Hitler from becoming Chancellor in 1933?
#1
Yes, to prevent the Third Reich from being established		  
#2
No, it would be undemocratic and dictatorial, the very thing the Weimer Republic's supporters claimed to be against		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 43

Author Topic: Should the Weimar Republic have banned Adolf Hitler from becoming Chancellor in 1933?  (Read 3675 times)
LBJer
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,649
« on: December 22, 2023, 02:28:50 PM »
I voted no, because they didn't have the hindsight about Hitler that we do and if a country is a democracy, banning someone from becoming its leader requires a really strong justification.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.