Which afterlife options (including lack of one) are most "acceptable" to you? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 11, 2024, 08:49:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Which afterlife options (including lack of one) are most "acceptable" to you? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which afterlife options are most "acceptable" to you?
#1
No Afterlife/soul, or Oblivion in belief systems your soul is destroyed
 
#2
Heaven (or equivalent)
 
#3
Purgatory then Heaven
 
#4
"Sleep" then Heaven or Bodily Resurrection
 
#5
Bodily Resurrection eventually
 
#6
Spirit in this world (existing with other Spirits, usually unseen by living)
 
#7
Spirit in a neutral or varied Netherworld
 
#8
Reincarnation
 
#9
Becoming one with the Supreme Force/God/Brahman/Ultimate Reality/etc. (usually the end of reincarnation in those belief systems)
 
#10
Hell (or equivalent)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 86

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Which afterlife options (including lack of one) are most "acceptable" to you?  (Read 8120 times)
Mopsus
MOPolitico
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,004
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -1.65

« on: September 08, 2017, 12:03:53 AM »

I think the only worthy afterlife would be one where anyone could die when they get bored with whatever heaven is found.

I think the norm would be to go insane if a person had to live for 10000000000000000000000000000000000 + years.

Perhaps that is why God is not showing his immoral face around for us to judge his sorry ass. God has gone insane.

How many years do you think you would last in your heaven?

I cannot fathom more than a few hundred.

Regards
DL


Surely, one has to assume that neither time nor boredom will be permitted through the pearly gates.
Logged
Mopsus
MOPolitico
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,004
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -1.65

« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2017, 12:07:08 AM »

If there is no time in heaven, then we could not think as that takes time. One may as well be dead. Consciously dead that is.

You don't need time to think if you know all things simultaneously.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

You're probably right - half the world's evil is inspired by sheer boredom.
Logged
Mopsus
MOPolitico
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,004
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -1.65

« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2017, 01:12:42 PM »

Without time, your thoughts which are made up of subatomic particles that move, must have time to move.

This is obvious to any who know how the subatomic world and nature works.

The cessation of time is a widely-attested phenomenon, even in this life. Go talk to someone who's dropped a lot of acid.
Logged
Mopsus
MOPolitico
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,004
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -1.65

« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2017, 06:59:01 PM »

The cessation of time is a widely-attested phenomenon, even in this life. Go talk to someone who's dropped a lot of acid.
I will let you as you seem to be one of them coming up with such garbage.

Not very open-minded, maaan
Logged
Mopsus
MOPolitico
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,004
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -1.65

« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2017, 11:17:07 AM »


You say that just because you cannot refute how thinking and subatomic particles work.

You say that because you cannot refute how personal experience works.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.