Woodrow Wilson vs. Calvin Coolidge (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 03:29:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Woodrow Wilson vs. Calvin Coolidge (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who was the better president?
#1
Wilson (D)
 
#2
Wilson (R)
 
#3
Wilson (I/O)
 
#4
Coolidge (D)
 
#5
Coolidge (R)
 
#6
Coolidge (I/O)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 57

Author Topic: Woodrow Wilson vs. Calvin Coolidge  (Read 8918 times)
Mopsus
MOPolitico
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,995
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -1.65

« on: July 31, 2014, 01:02:45 PM »

A pro-business fiscal conservative who was strongly in favor of anti-lunching and other civil rights legislation

Did Coolidge actually succeed in passing any anti-lynching or civil rights legislation though? As far as I know, the only race-based legislation that he signed while President was the blatantly racist Immigration Act of 1924.
Logged
Mopsus
MOPolitico
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,995
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -1.65

« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2014, 04:55:01 PM »

A pro-business fiscal conservative who was strongly in favor of anti-lunching and other civil rights legislation

Did Coolidge actually succeed in passing any anti-lynching or civil rights legislation though? As far as I know, the only race-based legislation that he signed while President was the blatantly racist Immigration Act of 1924.

He publicly called for it, but as usual, all efforts would be killed by Democrats in Congress.

Certainly, Calvin Coolidge is to be lauded for his support of civil rights, and Woodrow Wilson is to be denounced for his opposition to the same. But if Coolidge failed to materialize his views in the form of improving the rights of non-whites (with the exception of signing the Indian Citizenship Act, as Cathcon pointed out), are Wilson and Coolidge functionally different on that issue?

A pro-business fiscal conservative who was strongly in favor of anti-lunching and other civil rights legislation

Did Coolidge actually succeed in passing any anti-lynching or civil rights legislation though? As far as I know, the only race-based legislation that he signed while President was the blatantly racist Immigration Act of 1924.

It was more xenephobic than racist. At that time, America was becoming more Catholic, Jewish, Irish, and Italian. It wasn't really about race.

Most Catholic, Jewish, and Orthodox immigrants were not viewed as "white" by the native WASP majority. So it was about race, although I'll grant that it was about religion, too.
Logged
Mopsus
MOPolitico
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,995
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -1.65

« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2014, 05:48:23 PM »

MOP, yes I think there's absolutely a difference.  Just because the other party obstructed Coolidge's pro-civil rights goals does not equate him to an open segregationist...

No, Coolidge was not on the same level as an open segregationist. I guess that my point is that if someone has more in common with Wilson's approach to government than with Coolidge's, but is troubled by Wilson's racism (as any modern observer should be), it isn't necessarily worth it to vote for Coolidge on account of that one issue, given that, whatever his personal feelings, the latter did no more to improve the rights of African-Americans in real terms than Wilson did.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.