Which flavor of military is it better for a nation to have? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 06:29:30 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Which flavor of military is it better for a nation to have? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which flavor of military is it better for a nation to have?
#1
conscript
 
#2
professional
 
#3
mix
 
#4
other ('splain)
 
#5
none
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 39

Author Topic: Which flavor of military is it better for a nation to have?  (Read 4584 times)
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,704
United Kingdom


« on: September 11, 2009, 03:55:27 PM »

Chocolate.


Seriously, though, there should be no standing army, only a militia.

I basically agree with opebo, a small professional core for highly specialized positions is fine, but otherwise having a standing military is too dangerous, as the American experience so aptly demonstrates.
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,704
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2009, 04:57:32 PM »

I basically agree with opebo, a small professional core for highly specialized positions is fine, but otherwise having a standing military is too dangerous, as the American experience so aptly demonstrates.

Hmm.. you mean the imperialism?  Or those few occasions when it was used against the subjects?  It seems to me that as far as actually punishing the serfs, the american penal system of control has gotten by with only the threat of the military - the police and so forth seem to be quite sufficient for actual use.  The foreign adventures have profited the upper class mightily of course, and served to help in deluding the lower class, but I don't know that they were strictly necessary for the enslavement of those at home to be accomplished.

I guess I consider the bloated and corrupt military we have to be less a 'danger' than a miserable side effect of our main illness - the capitalist system.

I meant the imperialism and the massive entitlement people in the military eel with regard to their share of the tax loot; any talks of cuts to the DoD and they announce Armageddon.

Not to mention it's in their interest to promote all the wars.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.