Opinion of the Bible's literalism/historic-truth/scientific-truth/perfection? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 02:12:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Opinion of the Bible's literalism/historic-truth/scientific-truth/perfection? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Parts of the Bible are divinely-inspired, but not all of the Bible is literally true, in historical or scientific understanding or even moral teaching -- and that truth from God can come from other sources besides the Bible too... (see post)
#1
Agree
 
#2
Disagree
 
#3
Unsure
 
#4
Not Christian
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 28

Author Topic: Opinion of the Bible's literalism/historic-truth/scientific-truth/perfection?  (Read 3017 times)
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,959


« on: April 12, 2020, 12:08:03 PM »
« edited: April 12, 2020, 12:11:49 PM by afleitch »

All of the Bible is divinely inspired and all of it is true.  Not all of it is literal, but all of it is true.

That is demonstrably false. There are specific claims made in the bible that are statements of 'truth' (if you believe it is all true) that have no other value, either non literal or metaphorical and therefore have to stand as false.

To take a very simple example, Leviticus 11 20:23 'All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be detestable to you.' That is just false. It has no other value than as a statement of fact. The Bible also gets the value of pi wrong.

If there is no other value to 'false' statements (like say wiping out the Caananites, who weren't actually wiped out, or the entirety of Matthew 27: 50-53 which is a historical claim to which there is no evidence but still works as a statement of 'look how immense an act this was') then those statements are just false because they cannot stand on their own and don't need laborious (and literalists really really do this) explanations as to why ackshually.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.