Opinion of American drone policies (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 07:04:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Opinion of American drone policies (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you approve of using drone aircraft to kill suspected terrorists overseas?
#1
Yes, even if they're American citizens
 
#2
Yes, but only if they're not American citizens
 
#3
No, regardless of citizenship
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 85

Author Topic: Opinion of American drone policies  (Read 11866 times)
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


« on: February 12, 2013, 03:07:41 PM »

Use of drones is better than sending in troops in most cases. Given that the enemy in this case is a loose organization rather than a state, they can be in places where we just can't send troops to capture them. Using troops would probably result in far more bystander casualties.

If someone among the enemy organization happens to be a US citizen, I have no problem with the notion of using a drone against them. I also have no issue with some form of judicial oversight - if an American citizen living abroad has enough evidence against them to label them a terrorist and there is no practical means of bringing them in for a trial, then it shouldn't be too big of a deal to get a panel of judges to sign off on authorizing a drone strike if the opportunity should arise.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2013, 03:38:16 PM »

It seems there is a lot of talk lately about drones.  What's the difference between using a drone to kill terrorists (or "terrorists" if that makes you feel better) and using an Apache or F15?
There isnt, which is to say neither are acceptable

If none of those are acceptable, how would you propose to deal with terrorists on foreign soil where we can't send in troops to capture or kill them?
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2013, 04:29:04 PM »

It seems there is a lot of talk lately about drones.  What's the difference between using a drone to kill terrorists (or "terrorists" if that makes you feel better) and using an Apache or F15?
There isnt, which is to say neither are acceptable

If none of those are acceptable, how would you propose to deal with terrorists on foreign soil where we can't send in troops to capture or kill them?
Well i probably should have said that pragmatically yes drones are preferable, but as far as civilian casualties go there is largely no difference between the two.

Now as to what I propose? Absolutely nothing I dont personally believe in any sort of killing. Which is not to say I don't see the benefits of it, Its just that I oppose it on principle.

So if you were the one setting policy it would be to do nothing?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.