Are more thriving small businesses really better for the country? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 09:51:22 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Are more thriving small businesses really better for the country? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Are more thriving small businesses really better for the country?  (Read 3193 times)
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

« on: November 07, 2010, 03:30:11 PM »

More important than small business in on its own, a society with entrepreneurial spirit at least spurs creativity.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2010, 02:48:19 AM »
« Edited: November 08, 2010, 02:54:50 AM by phknrocket1k »

More important than small business in on its own, a society with entrepreneurial spirit at least spurs creativity.

     I more or less agree with this. If we encourage people to start small businesses, most of the businesses will be useless, but some will make more important contributions to the economy. As patrick1 pointed out, every business is a small business when it starts out; even something like Google or Apple.

Careful now; your starting to sound like a nanny statist.

To further elaborate. There are small businesses who are not interested in increasing economies of scope. I once interned for a self-employed sole proprietor insurance underwriter who simply had 2 interns. One to cold call and one to do clerical/admin work. These types aren't exactly the type that can grow to provide and create jobs.

Its the types that require angel and VC investors.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2010, 02:53:53 PM »

More important than small business in on its own, a society with entrepreneurial spirit at least spurs creativity.

     I more or less agree with this. If we encourage people to start small businesses, most of the businesses will be useless, but some will make more important contributions to the economy. As patrick1 pointed out, every business is a small business when it starts out; even something like Google or Apple.

Not true - some businesses started out big.  A good example would be the Home Depot - the whole innovation behind its business model was that it would be big.


Not counting retail or mining, most tech businesses started out in garages, bedrooms. living rooms, attics, dorm rooms, etc.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2010, 11:49:26 PM »
« Edited: November 11, 2010, 11:53:34 PM by phknrocket1k »

Ideally yes as small business are less likely to produce the idle fortunes that large businesses create. However, when a politician speaks of aiding small business, you can bet the farm he talking about giving more money to the super rich.

Actually, the probability of large businesses producing idle capital is virtually zero. For small businesses the probability is probably a little bit higher, but in general idle capital is extremely rare in a modern society.

He likely is referring to having a high % of cash to assets.

But even than, the cash is lying around in a bank and not in briefcases, ready to be loaned.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 10 queries.