New York State grabs the wrong man's guns

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

Krazen, errors are inevitably going to be made, for which remedies will have to be applied.  The error mentioned here was corrected using due process, so this case proves exactly the opposite of the point you seem to be trying to make.  That you seem to be unable to comprehend such things is what makes people think you are a kook, a troll, or both.  It's a shame as we could use someone here who makes a good case for quite a few of the topics you post on.  Alas, with you here, it is less likely that someone who can competently argue the positions you take will show up lest they be considered a kook or a troll as well. It is a shame that people tend to judge position by the quality of their advocates, rather than by the quality of the facts supporting the position. However since your posts cloud your chosen issues with poor quality in your facts, your advocacy, or both, you tend to lessen the support for the positions you advocate rather than strengthen such support.

Of course, you are not the only person who has posted in this thread that my comments in this post could apply to, but I'm not going to waste my time trying to improve those who rarely manage more than a single line of snark.  You clearly have some talent, I just wish you would make use of it more productively than you do.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

Once upon a time:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

or shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;

nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The First Amendment is also important, and thus absolutely immune to restriction.

I will accordingly be showing up outside Krazen's home (bunker?) at 3 AM with a soundtruck to blare political screeds at massive volume, followed by a loop of Dead Kennedy's.

If he complains once, he's obviously a communist who opposes the Constitution in it's entirety, and will steal your guns in a heartbeat.

Have at it. Make sure you carry your guns with you thought in case some of the leftists in the area decide to engage in violence.

You might need it.

Your response makes literally, absolutely, no sense whatsoever. I'd call it lame, but that'd be doing it an undue service.

PS I'm SURE you'd feel that way if I actually attempted to follow through with your theory of absolutist limitless application of constitutional rights (or do you only believe that of the Second Amendment?)

Trolling, but not total nonsense.  Indeed, it was one of krazen's better posts.

The First Amendment is also important, and thus absolutely immune to restriction.

I will accordingly be showing up outside Krazen's home (bunker?) at 3 AM with a soundtruck to blare political screeds at massive volume, followed by a loop of Dead Kennedy's.

If he complains once, he's obviously a communist who opposes the Constitution in it's entirety, and will steal your guns in a heartbeat.

Have at it. Make sure you carry your guns with you thought in case some of the leftists in the area decide to engage in violence.

You might need it.

Indeed, the part of your post and his reply that I bolded here shows he actually has a sense of humor.