CO: Rasmussen Romney by 4

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

I could see Romney having a small lead here, but not by 4.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

Yup, sure thing, Scotty.

Final poll in 2008: O +4
Reality: O +9

You realize this isn't 2008, right?

You realize this is Rasmussen, right?  More seriously, this is considerably more Republican than other recent polls and I think the next closest is a R+1 poll from We Ask America who I trust even less than Rasmussen.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

Yup, sure thing, Scotty.

Final poll in 2008: O +4
Reality: O +9

You realize this isn't 2008, right?

You realize this is Rasmussen, right?  More seriously, this is considerably more Republican than other recent polls and I think the next closest is a R+1 poll from We Ask America who I trust even less than Rasmussen.

Once again.  Party ID is fluid.  It doesn't mean anything.  It likely means with Rasmussen's methodology they are prone to finding more independents who will identify with Republicans at the time.  The reason they are so skewed towards the GOP is that their methods are horribly outdated, yet never readjusted. 

I was referring to Romney +1, not Republican +1.  I leave the scrutinizing of Party ID tea leaves to others.