Oil in Cuba (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 08:18:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Oil in Cuba (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Oil in Cuba  (Read 3353 times)
ragnar
grendel
Rookie
**
Posts: 170


« on: April 17, 2005, 04:18:57 PM »

So...it'd be like Venzuela basically?

I agree with Lunar. Venezuela is one of the largest producers of crude oil, 4th in the world if I believe, and has a very hostile president towards the U.S. in office. If we follow the theory that Iraq was all for oil, than Venzuela should be next on the list. Somehow I doubt we will have forces on the ground there anytime soon.

While i tend to believe the worst of Bush, i agree that he wonīt invade Venezuela.
but I donīt think even the worst republican/conservative partisan would call Venezuel an dictatorship.
If there was discovered big quentaty of oil in a HOSTILE dictatorship close to USA in an nonmuslim country, do anybody really think that ANY American adminsteration wouldnīt takes step to bring this strategecal resource under american control?
Logged
ragnar
grendel
Rookie
**
Posts: 170


« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2005, 04:43:17 PM »
« Edited: April 21, 2005, 12:54:09 PM by ragnar »

I'm an independent liberal and I don't feel that Castro and Chavez are really all that different in political status.  Chavez pretends a bit more and Jimmy Carter thinks he's decent, but that's about it.

Just like every country, American foreign policy acts in its best interests. 

1: Castro and Chavez are both autoritan leaders, but while Cuba is an one party dictatorship, Venezuela is not, it has nothing to do with the leaders, who are both amoral greedy bastards, who deserves to end up in prison for the rest of their lives, itīs the two countries who are different.

2: it was not an attack on US.
Logged
ragnar
grendel
Rookie
**
Posts: 170


« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2005, 12:53:37 PM »

http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/freeworld/2004/countryratings/venezuela.htm

Political Rights: 3
Civil Liberties: 4
Status:   Partly Free


Venezuela is not a nice place, but itīs not a dictatorship
Logged
ragnar
grendel
Rookie
**
Posts: 170


« Reply #3 on: April 24, 2005, 01:29:24 PM »

http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/freeworld/2004/countryratings/venezuela.htm

Political Rights: 3
Civil Liberties: 4
Status:   Partly Free


Venezuela is not a nice place, but itīs not a dictatorship

Those ratings have only been this good because of the resistance to Chavez. Now that Chavez stole bought 'won' the referendum, he's busy attacking anything that might possibly stand in his way. Read those links again - "The amendments extend the scope of existing provisions that make it a criminal offense to insult or show disrespect for the president and other government authorities." - from Human Rights Watch. Hello, what do you think Chavez is doing with these laws if not crushing all dissent?

Itīs not the Character of the ruler, who tells us, whetever a country is dictatorship, but the character of the people. While they are rare there have been enlighted dictators (or rather monarchs), but this doesnīt make their countries democrazies, bad and authoritarian democratic rulers doesnīt make a country a dictartorship either.
Logged
ragnar
grendel
Rookie
**
Posts: 170


« Reply #4 on: April 27, 2005, 01:32:26 PM »

http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/freeworld/2004/countryratings/venezuela.htm

Political Rights: 3
Civil Liberties: 4
Status:   Partly Free


Venezuela is not a nice place, but itīs not a dictatorship

Those ratings have only been this good because of the resistance to Chavez. Now that Chavez stole bought 'won' the referendum, he's busy attacking anything that might possibly stand in his way. Read those links again - "The amendments extend the scope of existing provisions that make it a criminal offense to insult or show disrespect for the president and other government authorities." - from Human Rights Watch. Hello, what do you think Chavez is doing with these laws if not crushing all dissent?

Itīs not the Character of the ruler, who tells us, whetever a country is dictatorship, but the character of the people. While they are rare there have been enlighted dictators (or rather monarchs), but this doesnīt make their countries democrazies, bad and authoritarian democratic rulers doesnīt make a country a dictartorship either.

The trendlines are worrying, and not headed in a good direction. You'll see in the months and years to come...

I tend to agree, but you donīt declare a country a dictatorship, while itīs still a democracy, even if it look like it going to be one.
Logged
ragnar
grendel
Rookie
**
Posts: 170


« Reply #5 on: April 27, 2005, 02:10:05 PM »

http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/freeworld/2004/countryratings/venezuela.htm

Political Rights: 3
Civil Liberties: 4
Status:   Partly Free


Venezuela is not a nice place, but itīs not a dictatorship

Those ratings have only been this good because of the resistance to Chavez. Now that Chavez stole bought 'won' the referendum, he's busy attacking anything that might possibly stand in his way. Read those links again - "The amendments extend the scope of existing provisions that make it a criminal offense to insult or show disrespect for the president and other government authorities." - from Human Rights Watch. Hello, what do you think Chavez is doing with these laws if not crushing all dissent?

Itīs not the Character of the ruler, who tells us, whetever a country is dictatorship, but the character of the people. While they are rare there have been enlighted dictators (or rather monarchs), but this doesnīt make their countries democrazies, bad and authoritarian democratic rulers doesnīt make a country a dictartorship either.

The trendlines are worrying, and not headed in a good direction. You'll see in the months and years to come...

I tend to agree, but you donīt declare a country a dictatorship, while itīs still a democracy, even if it look like it going to be one.

I called Chavez a Proto-Dictator in the other thread, to adjust for the potentiality of dictatorship. Kiki

you are right, he is one worst scumbags in South America
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 11 queries.