SENATE BILL: Party Hard Amendment (Failed)

[TNF]

This is a pretty straight-forward reform. The idea that three people constitute an organized political party is ludicrous.

[TNF]

Amendment is friendly.

[TNF]

I am fine with 7, though I agree with Bore that 5 is low.

[TNF]

Friendly

[TNF]

Objection

More delay for the sake of delay from our distinguished former President.

[TNF]

Aye and unfriendly to Spiral's proposed amendment

[TNF]

Nay

[TNF]

So why are we voting on this amendment? Seems like its just delay for the sake of delay from an undistinguished senator...

Well, I doubt Spiral could distinguish himself more than missing FORTY PERCENT OF THE VOTES in the last session like you did.

[TNF]

So why are we voting on this amendment? Seems like its just delay for the sake of delay from an undistinguished senator...

Well, I doubt Spiral could distinguish himself more than missing FORTY PERCENT OF THE VOTES in the last session like you did.

Obviously I'm not talking about Spiral.

>calls me 'undistinguished'
>hasn't gotten a piece of legislation passed that he wrote in two Senate sessions

lol

[TNF]

My nonvoting was a form of expression.

Expressing your inability and ineptitude at doing the job you were elected to do?

[TNF]

I just introduced a bill clarifying our laws for human clones.

What have you done lately?

The Sex Work Act was signed into law this week.
The Fair Labor Standards Act was signed into law yesterday.
An Actual End to Imperialism Act is at a final vote.
The Comprehensive Drug Reform Act is at final vote.
The Fair Amendment Procedure Amendment is being considered by the Senate, along with this one.
The Life Imprisonment without Parole Abolition Amendment is being considered by the Senate.
The "You Can't Fire Me, I Quit!" Act is being considered by the Senate.

I have introduced a number of bills to the queue improving labor relations, giving the people a choice in declaring war, allowing for referendums to pass legislation around obstructionist Senators like yourself, expanding freedom of expression, fighting child abuse, taking on big hospital companies and big pharma, keeping religion separate from the state, cutting corporate welfare, and battling plutocracy.

My record speaks for itself, as does yours. To call me undistinguished is all well and good; if being a 'distinguished' member of this body means introducing contentless bills like you and your buddy Tmth do on a regular basis, or scheming to win a popularity contest on the Internet (again, where you and your good friend from Kansas seem to excel), then I'd rather be undistinguished.

I find it quite odd that TNF is going after Napoleon so hard on inactivity, considering he has expressed multiple times that he will give his first preference in December to Xahar, the least active Senator by far.

There's a clear difference there. Xahar doesn't pretend to be an active and dynamic Senator; he doesn't go out of his way to cause catfights on the Internet (again, like you and Nappy). You're at least active, so I have few qualms with your backroom dealings. That's all part of politics of course, although you and Nap would again like to deny they happen. The problem with Nap is that he'll pretend to be an active Senator with a distinguished record and then miss a crapload of votes, slow the Senate down, and will run (and inevitably) win again after spreading his usual round of falsehoods and misrepresentations.

I find it quite odd that TNF is going after Napoleon so hard on inactivity, considering he has expressed multiple times that he will give his first preference in December to Xahar, the least active Senator by far.

Dick buddies?

Hilarious coming from you and Tmth.

[TNF]

Please don't tell me you're insinuating that Napoleon and I try and start cat fights and you don't... And for the record, I think I've introduced four bills in total, two in response to constituent requests. Funny hearing that criticism coming from you considering all of the ridiculous bills you have been introducing lately.

Napoleon has admitted to his poor activity record and has confirmed he will not be running for reelection, contrary to what you're suggesting. And I have no clue what you're referring to in regards to backroom dealings - though I consider him a friend, Napoleon and I almost never discuss what is going on in the Senate, and I think our very different voting records show we aren't in cahoots.


I would urge Senators to accept the amendment in question - I think the intentions behind this whole thing is good, and feel reasonably confident that with a 5-limit threshold, it would pass a public vote.

[TNF]

Amendment is hostile. Three people is not a political party.

[TNF]

At this point I don't think passing this bill is productive. I'm ready for a final vote and would encourage the Senate to vote it down.

[TNF]

Nay

Please put this thing to rest

[TNF]

Either way, 3 people is not a party no matter what.