But I am morally opposed to the fact that the simplest things like condoms are now being handed out for free.
This sounds like a judgment handed down on the assumption that condoms encourage people to have sex, rather than reduce the societal cost of it.
No, I have no problems with sex, being a teenaged male of course . My problem is the fact that the condoms are free. I can pay for my own condoms, and so can everyone else.
Condoms take up a smaller part of your discretionary income than they might someone else.
Condoms take up none of my income. But mentioning my non-existant sex life does not discredit my arguments.
I honestly didn't mean to imply that. The whole point I was trying to get to was that condoms might take up more of x person's discretionary income, and that's why I was arguing that they should be free of charge. My apologies.