SB 120-07: Commonsense Reproductive Protections Act - Failed (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 10:42:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SB 120-07: Commonsense Reproductive Protections Act - Failed (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SB 120-07: Commonsense Reproductive Protections Act - Failed  (Read 833 times)
Pyro
PyroTheFox
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,706
United States


WWW
« on: March 06, 2024, 10:05:45 AM »
« edited: March 06, 2024, 10:08:53 AM by Pyro »

As a proponent of women's reproductive rights, it is past time we address some of the most recent legislation passed that sought to restrict one's access to reproductive healthcare or introduce language meant to intimidate doctors and/or patients.

First, this would reinstate the Right to Choose Act, a law repealed out of absurd pretenses that doing so was a necessary trade-off to re-authorize medical euthanasia as a certified practice throughout Atlasia. RTC was a vital tool to protect healthcare in all regions, cementing reproductive care as a fundamental right for all Atlasian citizens while preserving the regional right to regulate pregnancy termination under certain circumstances.

Next, this proposal would repeal two bills designed as anti-abortion propaganda: SB 118-40 and SB 118-61. The former, a thinly-veiled attempt to intimidate doctors under the guise of "infanticide" fearmongering, is intended to sow fear and disinformation over an extremely safe medical procedure and, by introducing criminal penalties for medical professionals, has made it more burdensome for doctors to go into the reproductive healthcare field. The latter claims to prohibit abortions conducted due to "race, ethnicity, sex, or sexual orientation" (c'mon, now), however, as discussed in the original bill's debate, it is impossible for one to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a medical procedure was conducted due to "hate".

Finally, this modifies the Preservation of the Most Vulnerable Act to ensure women may still seek an end to their pregnancy if the fetus is experiencing a severe anomaly, syndrome, or disease that would likely result in death.
Logged
Pyro
PyroTheFox
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,706
United States


WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2024, 11:48:54 AM »

Motion for a final vote.
Logged
Pyro
PyroTheFox
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,706
United States


WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2024, 01:52:44 PM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.