Edwards' impact (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 09:58:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  Edwards' impact (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Edwards' impact  (Read 3029 times)
ATFFL
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,754
« on: July 06, 2004, 10:15:57 AM »
« edited: July 06, 2004, 10:16:18 AM by Tredrick »

I expect Edwards already built into the polls to a degree, especially here in NC where the local news has been talking as if he was the choice for the past month.

The further you get from NC the less built in he is.

His long term impact depends on what labels end up sticking to him in the campaign.  If the Republicans can paint him as a young, inexperienced, liberal trial lawyer who was going to lose his Senate re-election he can be ab albatross in Novenmber.  If kerry paints him as an energetic, charismatic moderate with a record of caring for the common man he can bring some mid-west states with him.
Logged
ATFFL
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,754
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2004, 10:35:14 AM »
« Edited: July 06, 2004, 10:36:49 AM by Tredrick »

I expect Edwards already built into the polls to a degree, especially here in NC where the local news has been talking as if he was the choice for the past month.
The only "proof" (the AP/IPSOS poll and the Mason-Dixon NC poll) shows otherwise.  That is, they do show a measurable difference when inserting VPs (Edwards and Cheney) into the question.  Note also that the AP/IPSOS poll, with its 1% Bush lead without Veeps was in pretty excellent agreement with other polls... showing Bush slightly ahead.  So, by all indications, this selection is not factored into any polls.  I'm not arguing that any impact will "stick"... esp. for four long months until election day.  But, nonetheless, the impact isn't in the current polls.

That's why I say "to a degree".  A VP choice can lead to a 5% or so bump.  I don't expect to see anything so large.  2-3% in most areas, less in NC and maybe VA.

A smart move on the Kerry campaigns part was to avoid any appearance with Edwards for a while.  By making appearing with Vilsack and others it took some of the attention off Edwards, making the obvious pick more of a surprise pick than it is.

I also wonder if it was a good idea to announce so early.  This is one of, if not the, earliest announcements of a VP choice in modern times.  It usally comes much closer to the convention.  It will be interesting to see what Edwards does for the next month and bow the BC campaign responds.

EDIT: One very positive I expect for Kerry is a firming up of his support.  I would expect mroe people to be voting for a Kerry/Edwards ticket than they were for a Kerry ticket without a VP.
Logged
ATFFL
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,754
« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2004, 08:54:17 PM »

 Edwards is a trial lawyer.  Look what happened to the last trial lawyer who ran in FL.  I don't see much help from Edwards there.  He can help in the rust belt though.

ALso, this is the earliest VP announcement in reent memory.  It may not seem early, but it is in historical terms.  It could prove a mistake as there is now no suspense heading in to the convention.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.