Your premise is faulty. The US did not support Saddam. It had basically the same relationship with Iraq that we had with nearly every other non-aligned country.
Aside from that, no I would not support Saddam.
Who sold him tons of weapons? And note the famous picture of Saddam shaking hands with Rumsfeld.
We've been through this, get it through your thick commie skull.
Saddam's top supplier of weapons was the Soviet Union, providing over 50% of the Iraqi arsenal, $25 billion out of $42 billion Iraq spent between 1979 and 1990 (They years Saddam was in power, but before the UN weapons embargo was imposed).
BRTD's claim was that the US sold Saddam "tons of weapons," not that the US was Saddam's "top supplier of weapons." Comparing the US and the Soviet Union won't change anything.
US weapons transacxtion with Iraq accounted for 0.05% of Iraq's weapons purchases. We sold them transport helicopters that did not even carry armaments.
I bet those helicopters weighed tons, though.
It's amazing how hard the left finds accepting the simple fact that the US was not a major supplier of weapons to Iraq.
If you want to talk about supplying military intelligence, then you have a case.