How can Trump be seen as 'tough on crime' when he's vouching to release Jan 6 criminals on day 1? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 12:27:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  2024 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, GeorgiaModerate, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  How can Trump be seen as 'tough on crime' when he's vouching to release Jan 6 criminals on day 1? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How can Trump be seen as 'tough on crime' when he's vouching to release Jan 6 criminals on day 1?  (Read 931 times)
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


« on: March 17, 2024, 07:03:14 PM »

Is this the best bait the left is capable of?

You are comparing convicted drug dealers and murderers to people who were standing in a building they weren't allowed to.

Absolutely f-ck off. You do not get to whitewash what happened that day, and frame it as a rally that just got a little out of hand.

They tried to kill members of Congress, overturn the election, and overthrow the government.

Anyone who set foot in the Capitol that day, without permission, should all be in prison for life.
You're confusing this with 9/11, which I'm sure you had a hand in. Trump said there were people on the rooftops celebrating in Newark, and we all know you were one of them!
This snarky reply makes no sense seeing as what Ferguson said is both unobjectionably correct and also something you legitimately wanted to happen in real time
If I wanted some kind of coup to succeed on January 6th, it'd have been nice then to know what the end game was. I still don't get what the end game was, other than to yell "rabble rabble rabble!" and raise a lot of hell.

"We" (I wasn't there, but whatever) chased Mike Pence home. Ok. Then what? How would Trump have managed to hold on from there? What was the next step? If you're going to accuse people of participating in a coup, you ought to, you know, have a clearly defined event to call a coup.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2024, 07:04:25 PM »

The most appropriate analogy, jokes about Ferguson being the 20th hijacker aside, is actually the Reichstag fire.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2024, 07:13:26 PM »

Is this the best bait the left is capable of?

You are comparing convicted drug dealers and murderers to people who were standing in a building they weren't allowed to.

Absolutely f-ck off. You do not get to whitewash what happened that day, and frame it as a rally that just got a little out of hand.

They tried to kill members of Congress, overturn the election, and overthrow the government.

Anyone who set foot in the Capitol that day, without permission, should all be in prison for life.
You're confusing this with 9/11, which I'm sure you had a hand in. Trump said there were people on the rooftops celebrating in Newark, and we all know you were one of them!
This snarky reply makes no sense seeing as what Ferguson said is both unobjectionably correct and also something you legitimately wanted to happen in real time
If I wanted some kind of coup to succeed on January 6th, it'd have been nice then to know what the end game was. I still don't get what the end game was, other than to yell "rabble rabble rabble!" and raise a lot of hell.

"We" (I wasn't there, but whatever) chased Mike Pence home. Ok. Then what? How would Trump have managed to hold on from there? What was the next step? If you're going to accuse people of participating in a coup, you ought to, you know, have a clearly defined event to call a coup.
To prevent the certification of the election so then state legislatures would send new slant of electors to award stays to Trump so he could stay in office. Like is this a bad faith routine or are you legitimately forgetting that they spelled out weeks and even months in advance what the idea was
That would require evidence of fraud. Which you have consistently said there was none of.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


« Reply #3 on: March 17, 2024, 09:12:13 PM »

The most appropriate analogy, jokes about Ferguson being the 20th hijacker aside, is actually the Reichstag fire.
Closest we've ever seen Fuzzy admit Trump is guilty
I'm not Fuzzy, I'm worse!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.