Appeals Court Backs Bush on Wiretaps (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 25, 2024, 09:23:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Appeals Court Backs Bush on Wiretaps (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Appeals Court Backs Bush on Wiretaps  (Read 2695 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,988


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
« on: June 09, 2006, 07:23:01 PM »
Is this the fascist orgy thread?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,988


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2006, 12:03:10 AM »
The fact is the Bush adminstration has ignored the laws that you are required to have permission from a judge to perform a wiretap.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,988


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2006, 01:46:40 AM »
Quote from: J. J. on June 10, 2006, 01:08:53 AM
Quote from: jfern on June 10, 2006, 12:03:10 AM
The fact is the Bush adminstration has ignored the laws that you are required to have permission from a judge to perform a wiretap.

Actually, that is not the "fact" in this case.  The case deals if the FCC can require manufactures to make it technically possible to wiretap a new device.

It a commonsense approach that has nothing to with authorizing wiretaps.

Well, you might be right, but I don't support anything that gives the adminstration more power until they start following the damn law.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,988


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2006, 01:58:48 AM »
Quote from: J. J. on June 10, 2006, 01:54:25 AM
Quote from: jfern on June 10, 2006, 01:46:40 AM
Quote from: J. J. on June 10, 2006, 01:08:53 AM
Quote from: jfern on June 10, 2006, 12:03:10 AM
The fact is the Bush adminstration has ignored the laws that you are required to have permission from a judge to perform a wiretap.

Actually, that is not the "fact" in this case.  The case deals if the FCC can require manufactures to make it technically possible to wiretap a new device.

It a commonsense approach that has nothing to with authorizing wiretaps.

Well, you might be right, but I don't support anything that gives the adminstration more power until they start following the damn law.

It doesn't even give them more power.  It's about requirements for the hardware.  This is basically saying that I can't buy a telephone that cannot physically be tapped.

Well, gosh, that'd be a pity if the Kerry campaign could then communicate without Karl Rove listening in.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.