John Roberts' Confirmation to the Supreme Court (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 11, 2024, 05:33:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  John Roberts' Confirmation to the Supreme Court (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: If you were a senator, would you vote to confirm him?
#1
Democrat -Yes
 
#2
Democrat -No
 
#3
Republican -Yes
 
#4
Republican -No
 
#5
independent/third party -Yes
 
#6
independent/third party -No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 54

Author Topic: John Roberts' Confirmation to the Supreme Court  (Read 4243 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,917


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« on: July 19, 2005, 09:26:36 PM »

Good heavens no!  If I were a Democratic Senator I would never vote yes on any Republican appointee.

Why on earth would one do that?

Arlen Specter would get the easiest 100-0 confirmation you ever saw.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,917


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2005, 08:16:17 AM »


Anti-enviornment, anti-civil rights, very pro-corporation.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,917


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2005, 09:13:10 AM »


Anti-enviornment, anti-civil rights, very pro-corporation.

Sounds like a good man to me.
LOL

Jfern, what do you mean by "anti civil rights"?

Voting act, busing, habeas corpus.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,917


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2005, 09:30:58 AM »


Anti-enviornment, anti-civil rights, very pro-corporation.

Sounds like a good man to me.
LOL

Jfern, what do you mean by "anti civil rights"?

Voting act, busing, habeas corpus.

And what rulings do you have to back up your viewpoint?
[/quote[

Opinions, not rulings. He's only been a judge for 2 years.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,917


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2005, 09:41:11 AM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Fine.

What rulings do you have to back up your viewpoint?

As I said, there weren't many, since he's only been on the court 2 years.  There was this one.

Joined a unanimous opinion denying the claim of a prisoner who argued that by tightening parole rules in the middle of his sentence, the government subjected him to an unconstitutional after-the-fact punishment. The panel reversed its decision after a Supreme Court ruling directly contradicted it. (Fletcher v. District of Columbia, 2004)
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,917


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2005, 10:54:17 AM »

jfern said something about it. Early in his career Roberts represented Reagan's administration on the issue and thus various communist "civil rights" groups will whine a little.

Only communists care about civil rights?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 12 queries.