Hillary Launches Re-election Website (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 02:48:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Hillary Launches Re-election Website (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Hillary Launches Re-election Website  (Read 5265 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,870


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« on: July 13, 2005, 06:53:15 PM »

The Senate race is going to be pretty dull. She's super safe.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,870


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2005, 03:33:03 PM »

I expect Hillary to win 65-33 or so.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,870


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2005, 03:48:23 PM »

I saw Cox on CNN and all he talked about was how Hillary's a carpetbagger.  that won't work not if it didn't work in 2000.

It's better than attacking her for being a liberal.

Arguable.  25% of people would go for that anti-liberal talk, maybe 30%.  It's a big question mark when you go carpetbagger, the amount of people that care could be very low and you risk getting blown out really badly.

No one cares about the carpetbagging. That Senate Seat went to a carpetbagger in 1964, 1970, and 2000. As of 2006, she'll have been in NY for over 7 years.  Pataki is really unpopular upstate, which will likely translate into votes for Hillary.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,870


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2005, 03:50:48 PM »

As of 2006, she'll have been in NY for over 7 years.

Since she was sworn in in January 2001, how would she be a Senator for over seven years in 2006?

Lived in NY, not been Senator.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,870


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2005, 03:53:07 PM »

As of 2006, she'll have been in NY for over 7 years.

Since she was sworn in in January 2001, how would she be a Senator for over seven years in 2006?

Lived in NY, not been Senator.

I misread. Didn't she move to NY in early 2000? It's still not over seven years.  Tongue

Middle of 1999.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,870


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #5 on: July 14, 2005, 04:14:03 PM »

Were I running against her, I would focus on her Presidential ambitions. Ask her to promise to serve out her term if elected, etc. Won't beat her but in combination with a decent campaign maybe it could keep her under 60. Certainly the carpetbagger approach won't work.

She said she'd serve out her first term, and no one believed her. Now if she doesn't promise the same, no one will care.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.