Reuters primary polling: tracking thread.

[Mehmentum]

[Mehmentum]

>not including Graham
>Reuters

The OP just forgot to add Graham's numbers in the post, he's corrected it now.  What's wrong with Reuters? It's not like they're Gravis, Zogby, or ARG. 

[Mehmentum]

The change since last poll numbers I added were actually incorrect, my bad. It's actually:

Clinton - 46% (-1)
Sanders - 44% (+6)

Also, these include Independents.

Conducted Feb. 2-5 following the Iowa caucus:

48% Hillary
45% Bernie

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-poll-idUSMTZSAPEC253J02S1

I don't understand.

[Mehmentum]

The change since last poll numbers I added were actually incorrect, my bad. It's actually:

Clinton - 46% (-1)
Sanders - 44% (+6)

Also, these include Independents.

Conducted Feb. 2-5 following the Iowa caucus:

48% Hillary
45% Bernie

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-poll-idUSMTZSAPEC253J02S1

I don't understand.

I used the most recently published pdf on HuffPost Pollster. Reuters is confusing since they have tracking polls as well as periodically published articles.
http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/2016Reutersipsos.pdf

Ah, okay I see my confusion.  The previous pdf was published pre-Iowa, but Tender's post was using the numbers post Iowa.