Redalgo
Sr. Member
![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif)
Posts: 2,681
![](./avatars/Socialist/S_MT.gif)
|
![](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/post/xx.gif) |
« on: January 05, 2011, 02:45:38 AM » |
|
|
« edited: January 05, 2011, 02:47:36 AM by Redalgo »
|
I support judicial review, although I do not believe the verdicts of judges should be derived mainly from the precedent set out by rulings in prior cases. For a Constitution to remain useful from one generation to the next it is important that the interpretations and fine details of it change over time so as to avoid having historic or contemporary rulings impede reasonable, culturally relevant adjustments in the future when the rationale behind the previous rulings may seem outdated.
|