New York State grabs the wrong man's guns

[krazen1211]

http://buffalo.ynn.com/content/top_stories/655499/judge-orders-guns-returned-to-amherst-man-mistakenly-identified-as-violating-the-safe-act/

A state Supreme Court Judge has ordered an Amherst man's guns can be returned to him after he was incorrectly identified as violating a mental health provision of the SAFE Act. Earlier this week, State Police say they made a mistake. As YNN's Kevin Jolly tells us, now State Police and the County Clerk's Office disagree on who's at fault.




Ah, due process of law flipped on its head. Thankfully there are still a handful of defenders of freedom.

[krazen1211]

Once upon a time:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

or shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;

nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

[krazen1211]

Once upon a time:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Emphasis mine.

In this case, the fiends in the government didn't merely well regulate the militia. They marched up to a member of the militia and deprived this man of his rights.

[krazen1211]

Once upon a time:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Emphasis mine.

In this case, the fiends in the government didn't merely well regulate the militia. They marched up to a member of the militia and deprived this man of his rights.

And then gave them back once they realized they made a mistake. I realize you're challenged for logic, but try again, nimmy.

If the state does not attempt to arbitrarily and randomly confiscate the people's guns, as New York State did for hundreds of years, mistakes will not be made.

And certainly New York State will not willingly compensate this good man for his time, his emotional duress, and the appropriate interest for usage of thousands of dollars of his personal property. An intervention by a judge or another defender of the people might be required.

[krazen1211]

Once upon a time:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Emphasis mine.

Precisely. That does not mean the Bloods, Crips, Aryan Brotherhood, or MS-13.

When did this good man become any of the above?

[krazen1211]

Once upon a time:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

or shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;

nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The First Amendment is also important, and thus absolutely immune to restriction.

I will accordingly be showing up outside Krazen's home (bunker?) at 3 AM with a soundtruck to blare political screeds at massive volume, followed by a loop of Dead Kennedy's.

If he complains once, he's obviously a communist who opposes the Constitution in it's entirety, and will steal your guns in a heartbeat.

Have at it. Make sure you carry your guns with you thought in case some of the leftists in the area decide to engage in violence.

You might need it.

[krazen1211]

Once upon a time:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

or shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;

nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The First Amendment is also important, and thus absolutely immune to restriction.

I will accordingly be showing up outside Krazen's home (bunker?) at 3 AM with a soundtruck to blare political screeds at massive volume, followed by a loop of Dead Kennedy's.

If he complains once, he's obviously a communist who opposes the Constitution in it's entirety, and will steal your guns in a heartbeat.

Have at it. Make sure you carry your guns with you thought in case some of the leftists in the area decide to engage in violence.

You might need it.

Your response makes literally, absolutely, no sense whatsoever. I'd call it lame, but that'd be doing it an undue service.

PS I'm SURE you'd feel that way if I actually attempted to follow through with your theory of absolutist limitless application of constitutional rights (or do you only believe that of the Second Amendment?)

I'm a patient man so long as you stay off my property. But I wouldn't necessarily state the same for others living on the block. It's them you might need to worry about if you decide to be a nuisance.