Constitutionality of banning certain types of bullets

[This user has not been convicted of 34 felonies]

I've been thinking about this...we hear about the pros and cons of gun control, but what about the bullet argument? Is it Constitutional to ban specific bullets that are viewed as too dangerous? I contend that it is on the grounds that it is not directly banning or restricting gun use.

What say you?

[This user has not been convicted of 34 felonies]

Well, I'm an amateur, but one can still bear arms. There's nothing about right to bullets

That's what I say. It doesn't make explicitly clear about usage of bullets.

[This user has not been convicted of 34 felonies]

Geez, this thread is green avatar central.