Good god, this thread is an abortion.
And given how exploitative the sex industry is (Do I really need to post evidence of this?), I can't possibly see it as 'freedom entertainment'. But whatever gentleman... continue your obviously metaphorical wanking.
Ok. Fair point. The sex industry is rather shafty. But nobody is forcing porn actors to perform. It's not sexual slavery, which is a seperate, much more serious problem.
Do I really need to go into an explanation questioning why these exchanges may not always be 'free' even if they are consensual (this is an important distinction)? No choice is free really.
Some people here can't seem to stand their consumer choices being criticized.
Bravo. Our most prolific poster is fittingly at the head of the band in this activity.
That said, I'd be surprised if most of the people voting freedom entertainment spent more than a penny on pornography. They probably just watch free videos on the internet.