Are we really going to elect some random no-name from Ohio and Richard Nixon just for the sake of change in this timeline?
Why do you call him a "no-name"?
He's not very notable, and doesn't seem to have done anything interesting in real-life. And we're just repeating the Nixon as VP thing if we elect this ticket.
Prior to his defeat in the 1958 Ohio Senate Election, he was seen as a conservative stalwart and might have been at the forefront of 1960's conservatism instead of Goldwater. With Bricker down, that's when the right really turned to GoldyBarr.
Poll
