Mark Hatfield (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 09:03:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Mark Hatfield (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Mark Hatfield  (Read 3086 times)
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,366
United States


« on: December 22, 2010, 07:59:18 PM »

I was wondering this prior to today, but Einzige's (I hope I spelled the name right) return got me thinking again, since I think it was him that kept pressing about Mark Hatfield in Han and Dallasfan's TBDFMIEM.

I was wondering why he's associated with Libertarianism. From what I read, he's basically a Liberal, not a Libertarian. I know he's said he's "committed to the cause of Libertarianism", but he just seems to be a pro-life Liberal. How is he associated with Libertarianism?
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,366
United States


« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2010, 08:56:50 PM »
« Edited: December 23, 2010, 09:15:24 AM by Cathcon »

It mostly has to do with his anti-Vietnam War stance. The man was not, per se, a libertarian - he would be an economic centrist, to the right of the Democrats of his era but probably in line with the DLC - but he was one of the very few Republicans to actually heed Eisenhower's warning in his farewell address. I disagree with the man on some issues, both economic and social, but the spirit of his message is, to me, fundamentally libertarian.

Okay. The thing is that it's been hard to find information about his economic views, and what I've found seems to be calling for more government.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Most likely, at least on social and foreign policy issues. The thing is that Reagan's rhetoric, even on the economy, at times failed to follow through in practice, such as when he voted to raise taxes, and had huge deficits. His image and his charisma, as well as the economy tend to overshadow some of the less than Conservative and less than Libertarian things in his tenure.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The guy was not a radical free-marketeer, but, as I hope I've shown, you don't have to be to be a libertarian. It's my point of view that the radical laissez-faire über alles types do more harm than good for the movement.
[/quote]

I've gone over his wikipedia article multiple times, looking for information on his economic positions, and it's turned up very little.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

As with Hatfield, mainly on foreign policy and social positions. However, on economics, from my limited knowledge, they'd probably be the exact opposite, thought it's debatable.


The main reason I'm asking is to find out how he would've acted as President, because in a timeline I'm writing, that would be useful.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,366
United States


« Reply #2 on: December 22, 2010, 09:04:04 PM »

The guy was definetly center-right on economics, though a dove on foreign policy. Would he, if elected in 1980, cut taxes? Definetly.

But there would be no military build-up, and a more centrist tone would be stricken on economics and social issues.

Let's just say the Republican Party would be far better off today if he had gotten the nod.

That's debatable, but I'd rather not get into it...
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,366
United States


« Reply #3 on: December 22, 2010, 09:11:11 PM »

The guy was definetly center-right on economics, though a dove on foreign policy. Would he, if elected in 1980, cut taxes? Definetly.

But there would be no military build-up, and a more centrist tone would be stricken on economics and social issues.

Let's just say the Republican Party would be far better off today if he had gotten the nod.

That's debatable, but I'd rather not get into it...



Just sayin'.

What?
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,366
United States


« Reply #4 on: December 22, 2010, 09:16:13 PM »

^^I fail to see the exact point. Are you saying that we've son more consistently with the Northeastern and Western states or what?
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,366
United States


« Reply #5 on: December 22, 2010, 09:22:45 PM »

I actually recall reading the above interview, and that was where I got the impression that he had less than Conservative economic view, talking about the government, specifically military, providing or at least having a hand in education, diet, housing, etc.

I'll skim through the interview again to find if you're referring to something specific.

I also remember in the interview him referring to himself as an (paraphrasing) "old school Liberal Republican", which is why I got confused on his economic view in the first place.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,366
United States


« Reply #6 on: December 22, 2010, 09:28:38 PM »

Old-school "liberal Republicans" were the closest things to libertarians to have ever held power for any significant period of time in this country. Again, you're being too absolutist in your definitions: despite what some Rand-worshipers may believe, capitalist economics is only one small piece of the libertarian puzzle.

As I know that, otherwise Libertarians would be Conservatives.

I know you've made the point moot now, but for the record, the quote is: "Yes, I'm an old guard Liberal Republican".

As for what you said about the old guard Liberal Republicans, I had been under the impression that "Liberal Republican" meant Teddy Roosevelt, practically the opposite of Libertarian, and that a "Conservative Republican" in the mold Arthur Vandenberg or Robert Taft would've been more consistent with Libertarianism.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,366
United States


« Reply #7 on: January 08, 2011, 10:38:37 PM »

We might have had a balanced budget amendment right now if it wasn't for his nay vote. Angry

A great man. One of the last truly great Republicans.

Total and complete HP. He belonged in the Democratic Party and was an embarassment to conservatives all across the country, especially those who supported the fight against Communism in North Vietnam.

I'm not really asking your opinion of him. I'm asking where he stood politically, and what his policies woudl have been politically, though I understand why the three of you have the opinions of him you do. That also goes for Einzige and Dallasfan. My reasons for wondering about Hatfield's policies is so that I can accurately portray him in a timeline I'm working on (wink-wink, nudge-nudge).
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,366
United States


« Reply #8 on: January 16, 2011, 10:09:05 PM »

You are JSojourner and I claim my five pounds.

Who?
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,366
United States


« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2011, 09:35:15 PM »


He was a liberal evangelical from Indiana who posted here. Mark Hatfield seems to be socially conservative, economically moderate and liberal on foreign policy.

I'm guessing he was a moderate Republican, huh? Think of Chuck Hagel's foreign policy, Mike DeWine's alleged economic liberalism and an even less severe brand of social conservatism. - He's still a conservative, but as liberal as you can be and still be called a "conservative".



From what I read, the only place Hatfield was Conservative on in social policy is abortion, and that he was very pro-gay rights. My impression would be of a western Progressive Democrat like George McGovern maybe, who was Conservative on aobrtion and economically moderate.

Also, why have I been accused by one person of being JSojourner?
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,366
United States


« Reply #10 on: February 05, 2011, 11:24:52 PM »

Anyways, JSojourner was a evangelical liberal from Indiana who posted here a lot.

So how does that make me him?
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,366
United States


« Reply #11 on: February 13, 2011, 12:21:21 AM »

I don't know. I wasn't the one who claimed that. I am guessing its because you come off as very spiritual yet free-spirited, like he did. You definitely aren't as angry as most conservatives. Even when there is a total Conservative majority (like between 2003 and 2007), many if not most conservatives come off as angry...yet happy-go-lucky. Kind of a violent euphoria, I guess...probably what it feels like to be on meth or coke or some other upper. That's not you.

Well, if you read the las couple pages of the "Pro-Abortion" thread, you might not say the same...Einzige tends to bring otu the worst in me I guess.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 12 queries.