Stop Hillary (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 09:47:01 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Stop Hillary (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should Hillary be stopped?
#1
Yes, anybody but Hillary
 
#2
No
 
#3
Not a Democrat or D leaner
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 49

Author Topic: Stop Hillary  (Read 7624 times)
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


« on: February 22, 2007, 10:53:05 AM »



It's so nice to see so many people not supporting Killary.  Welcome to the light!
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2007, 01:49:33 PM »

It's so nice to see so many people not supporting Killary.  Welcome to the light!

Did you actually stop to see why people are not supporting her?

Yup.  And I'll take it.  hahaha . . . just keep her out of the White House.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2007, 02:14:56 PM »


Why? She's a hell of a lot closer to you than any other Democrat.

Voting records do not reflect character. 
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


« Reply #3 on: February 22, 2007, 02:28:55 PM »

Who else is a war apologist who supports "stay the course" and was booed for saying so at a speech?

There is more to politics than a single issue.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


« Reply #4 on: February 22, 2007, 03:18:52 PM »

Then why does she continue to stand by her vote for the war?

And what the hell makes her more electable than Edwards? She's the most hated woman in the country.

Because you should always stand by your vote.  That doesn't mean you cannot change your mind on future votes which mirror the prior vote and defend it.  Considering those who voted for continuing the war in 2003 had advocated the same thing they said in the 1990s prior to going back into Iraq, based on the same knoweldge that they had at that point, their vote was justified.  Now that parts of what was understood to be true has so far turned up to be false, they can modify their position.  However, their vote in the past was their vote, and they should defend why they voted in that manner and explain how their vote would change in the future based upon new knowledge.  This is what sank Kerry because he couldn't explain his changes in position well.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


« Reply #5 on: February 22, 2007, 03:31:00 PM »

Edward simply said flat out "I was wrong." Why can't Hillary do the same? She's just a pro-war right-wing pandering whore.

Because, she wasn't "wrong."  At the time she casted her vote, based on the information she had at the time and in her best judgement for the good of the nation, her decision was sound.  Edwards, on the other hand, is the one pandering to the anti-war crowd.  That is why I get so annoyed with these "If I knew back then what I know now, I would have voted no" folk.  Have a spine and defend your actions, and then explain how in the future if the said event occurs again, what you would do to ensure you make the correct decision.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 15 queries.