I agree more with yours, but 100% agree with Feingold's stance. We shouldn't have gone into Iraq, & that while we shouldn't set a time table we should set some sort of outline off what specifically needs to be done, what needs to be accomplished in Iraq in order for our troops to come home instead off a blanket statement like the administration makes. Be more specific rather than geralizations
"There are not just two alternatives -- stay there forever and cut and run," he said. "There's a rational alternative -- that's where we need presidential leadership -- how long will this last, what makes sense, what needs to be done in what order and when can the troops come home? That's how we can tell the world we're not trying to occupy Iraq.
"The president has it completely turned around."http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/06/29/bush.speech/index.html
Poll
