I feel like they're all great -- any of the top four (of Masters, Lamon, Brnovich, or McGuire) would make an excellent candidate. I wish we could redistribute the AZ-Sen candidates to other states; they're somehow all better than anyone who ran in Ohio or Oklahoma. Even Olson is really just colorless as opposed to particularly bad in some way.
On an RCV ballot, I would first-preference McGuire. I think this is shaping up to be a race between Masters and Lamon, and of the two of them I think I'd support Lamon, merely because people I dislike within the party tend to support Masters, but Masters himself honestly seems fine and he would be in no danger of losing my general-election vote.
How is someone who said "privatize social security" a good candidate. You may agree with this position but that doesn't make it a good thing to say on a campaign trail
So it's his views on social security that's the issue and not things like, you know, promoting the great replacement theory or calling 1/6 a "false flag operation"?
Poll
