But just compare England before Cromwell took over to Cromwell's rule for proof that is can.
I appear to be missing something here but... are you seriously suggesting that England was "more free" before the Commonwealth than during or after it? If so, I suggest you read up on the period a lot more...
Admittedly I don't know much about it, but from what I do know I'd take the absolute monarchy over Cromwell's Puritan regime and its banning of literature, alcohol, theater not to mention the great decrease in religious freedom that happened as well.
The Pre-Cromwellian regime's abuses included imprisoning people without trial, collecting taxes without the consent of Parliament, and the like. On the whole, however, I would think that the reign of King Charles I was largely preferable to the chaotic and oppressive Commonwealth and Protectorate.
Poll
