VOTE

[Emsworth]

Proposals:



Proposal A (Hugh)
Electors: 104 - 133 - 132 - 60 - 109
Residents: 33 - 24 - 18 - 10 - 18
Voters: 18 - 12 - 5 - 5 - 9
States: 10 - 10 - 10 - 10 - 10


Proposal B (Hugh)
Electors: 96 - 130 - 119 - 84 - 109
Residents: 32 - 29 - 17 - 7 - 18
Voters: 16 - 17 - 4 - 3 - 9
States: 10 - 10 -10 -10 - 10


Proposal C (Lewis)
Electors: 65 - 56 - 189 - 82 - 146
Residents: 21 - 14 - 25 - 19 - 24
Voters: 9 - 10 - 10 - 10 - 10
States: 7 - 3 - 16 - 8 -16


Proposal D (Lewis)
Electors: 65 - 90 - 153 - 86 - 141
Residents: 21 - 21 - 22 - 20 - 19
Voters: 9 - 14 - 5 - 12 - 9
States: 7 - 7 - 12 - 7 - 17


Proposal E (The Vice President, Harry)
Electors: 104 - 118 - 106 - 106 - 104
Residents: 33 - 21 - 17 - 15 - 17
Voters: 18 - 11 - 4 - 7 - 9
States: 10 - 9 - 9 - 13 - 9


Proposal F (Emsworth)
Electors: 93 - 100 - 135 - 106 - 104
Residents: 31 - 26 - 20 - 15 - 17
Voters: 13 - 12 - 8 - 7 - 9
States: 10 - 6 - 12 - 13 - 9


Proposal G (Gustaf)
Electors: 117 - 153 - 106 - 78 - 104
Residents: 39 - 19 - 22 - 6 - 17
Voters: 21 - 5 - 12 - 2 - 9
States: 11 - 10 - 10 - 10 - 9

To vote:
- Rank all of the proposals in order, numbering them from one to five, with one being the most preferred and five the least.

[Emsworth]

Eh, what are you doing?

There were other proposals, and only a couple of people have voted on which maps will make the final poll. this thread is completely invalid until we actually have the contenders.

BTW, I think my other proposals were actually ahead of Hugh-A anyway.

It was at the Vice President's instigation that I set up this topic. I removed all maps with less than four voters in each region; these were all that were left. My own proposal was designed as an improvement of Harry's, so that the South could have more voters.

[Emsworth]

exactly. The first one was a joke, but the second was actually quite a good proposal.

I beg to disagree. One region, containing several states (MT, WY, CO, NM, ND, SD, NE, KS, OK, TX) had exactly two voters. Such a region, for evident reasons, is not viable.

[Emsworth]

Since no one has voted, we can add another proposal or two, then vote.

Well, I would have voted, but I chose not to while the vote was still being objected to. I would definitely modify my post to add further proposals (provided that each region contains a minimum of four voters). If it is felt that no further proposals need be added, and if there are no further objections, I am ready to vote.

[Emsworth]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Well, I think that these are the only five - excluding the "joke" and the regions with too few voters. I request the VP to let the proposals as they currently are stand.

If it is desired, I could add Hugh's other proposal - but it has three voters each in two regions.

[Emsworth]

whilst it is a good idea to have at least four voters per region, you can't just exclude the rest.

I would definitely be willing to include your first proposal. But to include those with two-voter regions would be pointless, as they cannot be used. But if you insist, I shall include them.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I can completely deny all accusations of gerrymandering for the sake of the Progressive Party, if that's what is being hinted at.

[Emsworth]

Regions don't HAVE to have governors.

It was so desired by the "initial vote."

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I offer my most sincere apologia for having offended you. Since you insist, I shall include the regions in question.

[Emsworth]

Indeed, if there is a problem of placement I am entirely willing to shift into other regions, so if need be, move me. Just ask permission first. If we've begun voting I am ready.

You could stay where you are, as the Southeast needs voters.

[Emsworth]

Now it's time for an edit-with all the proposals, and we can start voting (Unless you think it would be a good idea to start a new thread...we are on page three already afterall...)

I will add Gustaf's alphabetical proposal, and then make a new thread.