Which of these countries should have permanent UNSC seats? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 10:00:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Which of these countries should have permanent UNSC seats? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Brazil
 
#2
Germany
 
#3
India
 
#4
Indonesia
 
#5
Japan
 
#6
South Africa
 
#7
NOTA
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 60

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Which of these countries should have permanent UNSC seats?  (Read 1788 times)
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,064
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

« on: December 30, 2013, 03:23:03 PM »

NOTA.

Establish a seat for a semi-permanent veto power.  One nation serves a five year term as a veto power, but cannot serve terms consecutively.  Must be nominated by 3/5 existing veto powers and then confirmed by 2/3 of the GA.

Basically, the USA, UK, and France team up to appoint pro-NATO countries to the seat while the BRICs and other third worlds are satisfied because the seat is "elected".

Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,064
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2013, 11:59:25 PM »

SEMI-PERMANENT ELECTED VETO POWER.

Five year terms.  Non-consecutive.  Nominated by 3/5 of current permanent members.  2/3 vote for confirmation in the GA.   

This was my proposal to reform the UNSC at one of my high school mock UNSCs.  I was Germany.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.