In my view, Jesus is nothing more than a fairy tale character regardless of his reality in whatever sense because of the worship of his legend.
What do you have against fairy tale characters, many of whom are more "real" than human beings who actually lived in terms of their impact on human life? "Fictional" versus "Nonfictional" is a fairly irrelevant distinction.
My problem is the very fact that they are characters. There is no truth, just interpretation. That leaves the door wide open to abuse. The very impact Jesus has had as a character is why I have a distaste for the idea of deriving a heavy amount of moral and societal value from a character that can represent anything their audience stands for. Especially when there are so many pockets of bigotry littering the bible in the name of an indisputably dominant cultural figure. But I do agree that the distinction between fictional and nonfictional historical figures is weak. It all depends on their impact as a cultural mainstay. Jesus has had a horrendous impact on the world as both.
But you are blantatly ignoring all the positive impact he had.