The Imperial Dominion of the South's Legislature (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 10:23:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  The Imperial Dominion of the South's Legislature (search mode)
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23
Author Topic: The Imperial Dominion of the South's Legislature  (Read 305816 times)
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #425 on: January 12, 2012, 11:52:56 AM »

     FTR, the proposed cuts would necessitate $11 billion in spending cuts.
Leaving the gas tax as is would only necessitate around $3.6 billion.

Clarence, I'm thinking that we should merge and cut the "defense" and "protection" categories.  What say you? Link for reference

PiT, is the $6.6 billion in interest counted in the balance?  Because, barring clarification from the GM, it should not be (and that would let us keep our surplus too).

Yelnoc or PiT- what is the difference between Protection and Defense spending? I would oppose cutting defense
One of them is the militia.  The other is protection, whatever that means.  Regardless, I don't know what we need a large para military force for unless we want to try and secede for a third (or would it be fourth?) time.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #426 on: January 12, 2012, 09:39:10 PM »

     The interest is counted. If we decide that it shouldn't be counted, then we could eliminate the Social Security Tax without incident.

     I assume "Protection" refers to the police. Given that we have taken authority over the affairs of the state governments, we would also have authority over the various state police forces.

There is a note besides the interest category within the bill itself which hints that paying our interest is the response of the federal government.  Hey, down the line sometime, we should pass a bill outlining the process of obtaining a loan.  I have some ideas, but I will leave them for later.  Anyway, let's bring Tmth or Shua (or both) in on this.

And if protection refers to police, which makes sense, I don't think we should cut it.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #427 on: January 12, 2012, 09:43:37 PM »

In that case I would oppose cuts to defense or protection and propose instead the following cuts-

General government- 2 billion
Welfare- 2 billion
Pensions- 2 billion
Transportation- 5 billion
We only need $3.6 in cuts to balance getting rid of the (false) social security tax.  Allowing the federal government to assume our interest would leave us with a surplus of roughly $3 billion, making other cuts unnecessary.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #428 on: January 12, 2012, 10:29:37 PM »

In that case I propose General government 2 billion dollar cut and Transportation 5 billion dollar....better to cut too much then too little
But what is the transportation cutting?  And the General Government?  Are we going to have to bring back gas lights?  Shut down MARTA?  Let's think before swinging around our hatchets.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #429 on: January 12, 2012, 10:45:30 PM »

In that case I propose General government 2 billion dollar cut and Transportation 5 billion dollar....better to cut too much then too little
But what is the transportation cutting?  And the General Government?  Are we going to have to bring back gas lights?  Shut down MARTA?  Let's think before swinging around our hatchets.

I propose leaving it to the regional Secretary of Transporation...I don't think any specific allocations in the budget, so I say we give them less and see what they think it invaluable enough to cut
'cept we don't have a Secretary of Transportation.  If we ever get a hyper-active moderator staff, this is the kind of thing that could come back to bite us in the ass.  Last I checked, the IDs still has the (inexplicably) highest unemployment rating.  More cuts, especially in sectors that employ a large number of government workers like the DOT, will have hurt the economy, not help it.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #430 on: January 13, 2012, 06:00:14 PM »
« Edited: January 13, 2012, 07:27:31 PM by Yelnoc »

According to Shua, the state debts are none of our business.  So I present the following for debate.  Under this plan, we will retain roughly a $3 billion surplus.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #431 on: January 13, 2012, 07:29:07 PM »

Actually, I suggest changing that last phrase to "and considered to have been assumed by the federal government."    The federal government would have assumed this debt at the start of Atlasia, and so be in the national debt figure already.  I think that understanding of the issue makes the most sense since that since I can't find evidence of any other region discussing the issue of debt from its states before.

Regarding the unemployment rates, you don't have the highest, but you do have the second highest - even though it's been falling.  I imagine taking in so much more taxes than you spent wasn't helping matters.
Edited.  And I imagine you are right.

I support your amendment Yelnoc and will follow it with mine which gives the surplus back to citizens... I believe shua's last remark supports that
Sure, once we get this passed I will put that bill up to debate.

Taft, would you do me the honor of bringing the 2012 Budget Amendments to a vote?
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #432 on: January 14, 2012, 12:46:39 PM »

OH YELNOC YOU'VE MADE THE HAPPIEST GIRL IN THE SOUTHEAST! Cheesy

THE BILL IS NOW UP FOR VOTING.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

*cough*

It's this 'un.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #433 on: January 14, 2012, 12:47:07 PM »

And aye.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #434 on: January 16, 2012, 02:54:52 PM »

Alright, the bill passes unanimously and is on the Emperor's desk. (remember to make the changes to the actual budget Wink)
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #435 on: January 16, 2012, 10:39:54 PM »

Here ya go, clarence.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I think a portion of it should be set aside in the Rainy Day fund, as a cushion against any future budget woes and the rest given back.  What say you guys?
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #436 on: January 16, 2012, 11:07:12 PM »

$35 billion.  Surplus from 2011 numbers $216.6 billion.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #437 on: January 16, 2012, 11:30:43 PM »

In that case- I move to amend to bring the rainy day fund up to $50B with the remainder going to rebate
Sounds like a plan.  Something thusly?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #438 on: January 16, 2012, 11:36:28 PM »

Awesome.  Let's give Ping until tomorrow to weigh in and than taft can bring it to a vote.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #439 on: January 19, 2012, 11:07:42 PM »

Aye.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #440 on: January 21, 2012, 12:15:48 PM »
« Edited: January 22, 2012, 05:47:36 PM by Yelnoc »

Let us begin debate on this bill.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #441 on: January 22, 2012, 02:25:11 PM »

Very well then.  Does anybody else spot any holes in it?
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #442 on: January 22, 2012, 05:49:29 PM »

Is the Viceroy second in succession or first?... might need to switch wording there
First.  Fixed that.

     Why not retain the Viceroy as a Legislator who just happens to also be a backup Emperor (as selected by the Emperor)? I think it would be interesting for the Emperor to have complete control over who his second-in-line is.
I would prefer the body be composed entirely of elected officials.  The Emperor already appoints members when there is a vacancy, which is more often than not. 
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #443 on: January 23, 2012, 06:33:32 PM »
« Edited: January 23, 2012, 06:39:19 PM by Yelnoc »

    I didn't think of making the Viceroy be completely unelected, though that is an interesting prospect.
Well then, what did you mean?  Are you saying that the Emperor would be required to choose one of any of the elected five legislators to be his successor?  I would find that a little more agreeable, though if that is the case we ought to insert a clause indicating that the Speaker should succeed in cases where no clear delegation of succession has been made.

EDIT:  It might be a good idea to put in place a transitional clause, so that the two members are elected in a special election.  What would you guys think about those two members being in official "class B" seats that are elected with the Governor?
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #444 on: January 23, 2012, 08:59:31 PM »

How about making the Viceroy picked by the Emperor, but has to be approved by the Legislature?
Seems like unnecessary red tape to me.  And as Clarence points out, making the Emperor strong enough to meddle directly in legislative affairs outside of his veto power could backfire spectacularly under a future Emperor.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #445 on: January 23, 2012, 11:27:57 PM »

How hard would it be to make the Viceroy the person who wins the most votes out of the Class A Legislators?
Not hard.  Class A being the legislators elected separately?

My concern is that by separating the Viceroy and Speaker, we are adding an unnecessary extra layer.  I prefer a stream-lined bureaucracy.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #446 on: January 24, 2012, 12:06:06 PM »

Well wait, hold on now, what do you guys think about having the two extra seats elected in the same month as the Emperor?
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #447 on: January 24, 2012, 08:51:34 PM »


Yes, you are Darth Teddy.  I am Darth Yelnoc.  Our colleague is Darth Clarence.  This is the Imperial Dominion of the South, remember. Tongue

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Added it to the bill.  I had thought about including a transitional provision that would have set up a special election to fill the Class B seats for the first time.  However, the date of their election is less than a month away, so they would have to be elected and then reelected.  The other options are to let PiT choose the replacements, or delay this bill from coming into effect until the time the vote Class B votes are scheduled to begin (with the election for Emperor).  Thoughts?
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #448 on: January 25, 2012, 06:32:18 PM »

I have some questions for either Yelnoc or PiT before I write my school vouchers bill....

What is the population of the region?
What is the population under 18?
What percentage of the education budget goes to grade schools?
I don't know off hand.  We could find out, like we did with the budget when we drafted it, but now that we have an SoIA we might as well let him crunch the numbers (PM Tmthforu).

So, any other concerns, or are we ready for a vote?
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,220
United States


« Reply #449 on: January 26, 2012, 12:04:56 PM »

In that case, Taft, would you do us the honors one last time?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 13 queries.