Don't forget Joe Johnston was also a very capable individual. Had Davis not removed him a put in Hood, the Confederates might have been able to hold out long enough to effect the 1864 election. It was the fall of Atlanta, more than anything else, that convinced the northern public that the war could be won. But, Davis didn't want Confederate men "retreating" as he called it, and so, he sacked Johnston, and his very well thought out gradual defense plan, and went with Hood... well, I am sure you know the rest.
I still can't fathom why he put John bell Hood in that position. Was it simp,y because he felt Johnston was fortifying instead of attacking? I know Davis hated Johnston as much as he hated Bearegaurd, but why one armed Hood? I guess ego makes people do stupid things very easily.
Civil War talk is never as fun if States isn't in the conversation.
Imagine if Stonewall Jackson wasn't shot and died shortly after contracting pneumonia during the battle of Chancellorsville. What effect would he have had durring the remainder of the war?
I would like to suggest that the War between the States produced two brilliant genrals (Jackson for the south, and Sherman for the north).
There were a couple of very capable commanders on both sides that did not get the credit they earned due to the inability of the respective Presidents to understand their merits (McClellan for the north, Johnston for the south).
Unfortunately both sides had a lot of idiots in command of troops.
Basically the north won because of its superior resources.